Wednesday, August 13, 2008

nastiness begets nastiness, etc.

posting removed per request of named individuals.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

10 Comments:

Blogger Little Tigger said...

I think you have done the right thing,
Dysam.

If I still believed in dating,
and reships, I would thank
you as loudly and as gratefully
as I am now.\\\\\\\

Thank you Dysamoria for this
Very Useful warning.

I know this piece of rubbish
beanhatch would have caused
me no end of tantrums and
seizures, I might have even
pooped on her head.

I know for sure I would have
kicked her out of my house and
wiped my butt with all her trousers
and then used her shirts for
blowing my nose and disposing
of all my hockers.

I hope you never have to go thru
any of this again, I know I will not,
I have sworn off dating/reshipsshis
for the rest of my life, they are
nothing but trouble and "gold diggers"
who just want to poop on your buttstick
and hock loogies on you.

Reships are trouble, trouble, trouble
and nothing but pain, they will never
do any good, and no good can ever
come from them.

I don't boss my frends around
(I really hope I don't without
realising it) I won't tell you what
to do like able grable poopytable
likes to, so I will just say, I wish
you good fortune in what ever
you decide to do, I may cry if
something poopy happens to you,
but I have no business being a
tyrant and dictating things to you,
America is Supposed to be a Free
Country, so I will excercise what I
belive in, to the best that I can.

Is it ok if I ask you as my frend
to please be careful with reships
and dating? Because dating as you
more than likely already know is
nothing but pain. (Sorry, my
idea of it that is, I can't tell you
what your idea of dating is, only
you can.)

Pick a booger and good luck.

3:33 AM, August 13, 2008  
Blogger harry said...

so a cursory look at your blog makes you seem totally unbearable. if someone chooses to no longer be involved in your life, let them go. what does it say about you that someone had to go to great lengths just to get you to leave them alone?

if so many women are treating you this way, maybe the problem is you. it does not sound appealing at all to have someone ranting about how they're mistreated by everyone and how the world is against them and having to have the person CRY IN THEIR LAP for hours over a misunderstanding. nor does it sound appealing to have a person you want out of your life try to contact you over every possible medium and attempt to harass your friends. it is also appalling that you chose to share personal information and contact information about a person who wants to cut you out of their life.

you can blame autism or blame your past as much as you like, but you sound like a terrible, vindictive, angry, whiny, entitled brat.

i am not a friend of this person and am an impartial observer, actually linked by a friend of yours who cannot take you anymore.

10:33 AM, August 13, 2008  
Blogger dysamoria said...

a cursory look... therein lies your mistake, Harry. as for being a friend of someone who is a friend of mine who cannot take me any more... i cannot take that "friend's" treatment of me any more.

you took a cursory glance. so you know nothing. you know the worst of me.

you don't know me. you're not impartial because you are already fueled by expectations based on your connection to that friend who cannot bare me any longer.

Brielle didn't leave me during crying in her lap. Brielle didn't leave me after i did anything specific that i can see. She didn't tell me, either, what i'd done. Just "saying things to my friends about her" was all i got after the week of being ignored.

is that the proper way to move out of someone's life? Just ignore them after you've seen them and said "see you later" before going on a trip to visit someone?

It's childish and it's avoidant behavior. then to be treated like i was a no body once she finally was trapped into accepting a phone call....

buddy, you have it all backwards. i did nothing against Brielle until yesterday.

i tolerated her depression for 1.5 months and supported her when she complained about family and money and work and life. i was THERE. i even drove her to her first job interview at her current employer. sat there in the car while she had her interview. treated her to lunch to celebrate the positive experience. was loving and caring and friendly.

she goes on a little weekend trip and suddenly i get no answer to my messages, calls, texts. nothing.

yeah, that's right, pal, tell me that it's a clear reason to erase me.

fuck you, impartial Harry. Like Able, you have no profile or identity. You don't know me. You don't know Brielle. You don't know what i went through with this "friend that can no longer bare me."

start at the beginning next time. ask questions next time. identify yourself next time. or just fuck off because your opinion is based on conjecture and bias and you know nothing of the truth in the chronological order it occurred.

11:45 AM, August 13, 2008  
Blogger harry said...

so you are saying that you have never said anything negative about or contacted or harassed the person you're writing about before today? you have blog entries dated before today where you say rude/personal/negative things about her.

every single entry in your journal is about the world wronging you- your employer, the chief of police, your friends, your lovers. the common theme here, buddy, is you. you come across as histronic, melodramatic, manipulative, childish, entitled, and threatening. there is absolutely no reason anyone would, or should, stick with you to tolerate this behavior. you use threats of suicide and public shaming to keep peoples' attention and to punish them for not treating you exactly how you feel you should be treated, and you parade your behavior on the internet to receive the maximum amount of attention for your stunts.

you cannot keep twisting reality to make yourself an innocent victim. maybe it's unfair for this person to suddenly cut you out of your life, but maybe that's what they had to do to deal with you- if this person had confronted you, would you respect her wishes, or would you have tried to manipulate her/insult her/publicly humiliate her like you are now? this seems from the outside to be a no-win situation, and i applaud anyone who is able to put up with your antics.

our friend said to me, "am i being unfair?," so i looked at your journal objectively (as this mutual friend also has a flair for the dramatic), and i came to this conclusion on my own, based solely on evidence you've provided in this journal.

1:08 PM, August 13, 2008  
Blogger Little Tigger said...

harry is "Able" god, once a terrorist,
always a terrorist.

you can drool on the table all you
want archer barcher smelly grarcher
but Dysamoria WILL NOT CHANGE
just for YOU!!!

2:10 PM, August 13, 2008  
Blogger Little Tigger said...

Dysam, please update my database
if that statement was off.

2:11 PM, August 13, 2008  
Blogger dysamoria said...

September 2005 is where this blog began

September 2005.

September 2005.

10:02 PM, August 22, 2008  
Blogger Little Tigger said...

Zorry I froggot to unsub this
htthread.

Poop

10:07 PM, August 22, 2008  
Blogger Intransitivus said...

FYI and FWIW: Jace removed his blog from public access to accommodate the request that the offensive blog posting be removed.

Before making the blog public again, we erased the offending content of this blog entry but felt it important to retain the commentary by John and Harry.

Harry assumes that previous postings were about the same girl. That's an incorrect assumption. Jace posted over 500 blog entries since 2005. They were about all kinds of things. Harry judges them to be all the same thing and uses this judgment to conveniently determine that every single entry is Jace's bad attitude. How is it Harry's right to determine whether it is fair or not to decry the abuses one has received from people?? How is it ANYONE'S right to further shame a victim by labeling them a complainer, whiner or ranter? (general words, not necessarily Harry's word-for-word terms, but the same attitude)

Shame on you, Harry and John. Should it be MY privilege to judge your personal reactions to the traumas you've experienced in life? I don't think so.

Neither Harry or John bothered to actually read, UNBIASED and OPEN MINDED, the entire blog from start to finish (though John prevaricates to have done so). If Harry had done so, he would see that his phrase "every single entry in your journal" etc. a falsehood. There are countless entries about wider topics. Even entries that attempted to promote good will to other people.

Shame on you.

John even went so far as to declare that Jace gave no information to Dave about Jace's personal status prior to the "goon's assault" (to use his language, if not his exact wording) telling Dave, politely (as you can read it), what was up with Jace.

Why John judges that person to be "Jace's Goon" is beyond me. How he can determine, without knowing the person, that they are "pandering" to Jace because of an "obsessive need to coddle others" is beyond my comprehension.

John and Harry made a whole load of judgmental statements and declarations that are either filled with holes, inaccurate or just plain wrong.

I know more than John or Harry about Jace's past interactions with Dave (and I probably know more about Jace's past interactions with John than Harry). Not all of those interactions were good and not all of them were bad.

It's crossed my mind to post some of Jace's private emails to Dave as evidence of his attempts to share with Dave and protect the friendship with Dave. For God's sake, must i really go that far?? It's already a lot of my time to take over management of this blog. Must I dig through email archives and paste into blog comments or make entries about them just to prove to people how wrong they are when they feel the need to harass Jace for having been Jace?

I didn't agree to that job.

If John and Harry want to judge Jace based on limited information, so be it. Just know that they have passed the WRONG judgments, with severity undeserved, and with no sense of objectivity, compassion, empathy or even a little decent research.

While Harry was more eloquent and less caricaturistic in his postings compared to John's, his judgments are no more valid than John's.

You think being aggressive and judgmental is the high ground? Funny that you decry such action when it is Jace's but you glorify it with your OWN actions.

Please let this be the end of this stupid pissing contest. Despite claims of "never wasting [his] time reading [Jace's] blog again", I know that John will have the compulsion to looksee what has been posted to follow-up his diatribe. If he and Harry can keep quiet, then so will I. If they can back down, then all the better.

-i

10:57 AM, September 24, 2008  
Blogger Little Tigger said...

Grape Jelly Grape Jelly
WOO HOO HOO!!!!!

7:31 PM, September 24, 2008  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home